Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bryce Wilkinson's avatar

Enjoyed the article Grant. An illustrative statistic of how constrained household budgets were during the war is the extraordinarily low ratio of consumer spending to GNP during that period. I think that can be dug out of the older online official yearbooks which published the first official national income statistics. People must have accepted going without, in a good cause.

Len Cook's avatar

On a similar vein, and an enjoyable read is "Eggs or Anarchy" is one of the great, British stories of the Second World War yet to be told in full. It reveals the heroic tale of how Lord Woolton, Minister for Food, really fed Britain in Second World War. As a nation at war, with supply routes under attack from the Axis powers and resources scarce, it was Woolton's job to fulfil his promise to the British people, and Prime Minister Winston Churchill in particular, that there would be food on the shelves each week.

By the end of the war the British were healthier than at the start.

My understanding is that even by 1949, much rationing remained and became less welcome.

Eggs were referred to in the title, as before 1940 eggs were few and far between in poorer places of the UK. They were a special focus of rationing.

As google notes "This book, for the first time, finds out the real story of how Lord Woolton provided food for Britain and her colonies and discovers that for him there were days when it was literally a choice of 'eggs or anarchy'."

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?